Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: Serpent Seed Doctrine

  1. #11
    Senior Member Colonel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    14,487
    Thanked: 5793
    Quote Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
    I do too! I find very hard to believe ( and I don't) that the serpent had intercourse with Eve which produced Cain.

    Anyone who is yet unredeemed by the blood of Christ is spiritually dead in trespasses and sin (Eph2:1) and are of the devil (1 Jn 3:10).
    This is because of the fall and not because of the bloodline of Cain.
    You just summed up what I think of all the various theories that state that the redemption story was about securing a pure bloodline for the Christ rather than about the problem being that everyone sins.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Colonel For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020)

  3. #12
    Administrator fuego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    16,273
    Thanked: 14129
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel View Post
    You just summed up what I think of all the various theories that state that the redemption story was about securing a pure bloodline for the Christ rather than about the problem being that everyone sins.
    Securing a blood line sounds more like a 'The Da Vinci Code' plot than the Bible.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fuego For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020), tschau (10-05-2020)

  5. #13
    Senior Member Colonel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    14,487
    Thanked: 5793
    Quote Originally Posted by fuego View Post
    Securing a blood line sounds more like a 'The Da Vinci Code' plot than the Bible.
    Right. Another one of those strange doctrines that not many Norwegians believe in.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Colonel For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020), tschau (10-05-2020)

  7. #14
    Senior Member Smitty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Everett, Washington
    Posts
    1,629
    Thanked: 1786
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by fuego View Post
    Securing a blood line sounds more like a 'The Da Vinci Code' plot than the Bible.
    This is just my opinion, and I am by no means an authority on the subject but I think the bloodline Jesus came from is related to His lineal sequence of a pure genealogy.

    Satan knew if he could corrupt the lineal genealogy passed down through the centuries, Jesus would not be born from a pure bloodline.

    This leads me to ask the question: Where did the giants (Nephilim) come from?

    The only logical conclusion that I can come up with is satan was bent on corrupting the genealogical seed from which Jesus descended from. If the devil could corrupt the bloodline, the genealogy of the seed would be tinted.

    So, it makes sense to me that satan was behind the creation of the "giants" by commissioning fallen angels to copulate with women to "corrupt the seed" by bringing into existence an angel-human hybrid type of corrupt being "Nephilim" in hopes of corrupting the genealogy seed of which Jesus would be born from.

    That is why I believe God produced a "divine genocide" through the flood in order to eradicate the "corrupt seed" and start over with Noah.

    Second Peter 2:4 mentions that these fallen angels were sent to the deepest darkness (Tartarus) in chains to be kept until judgment.

    Although Enoch's book is not included in the cannon of Scripture, Jude quotes directly from 1 Enoch 1:9 in his writing in Jude 14-15.

    And it is also interesting to note what Enoch recorded in his writing in 1 Enoch 7:2;

    "And when the angels, the sons of heaven, beheld them,
    they became enamored of them, saying to each other,
    Come, let us select for ourselves wives from the progeny of men,
    and let us beget children."


    I've been told I had greatly missed it when I mentioned this stuff before (not necessarily here) but like I said, this is just my opinion.
    If you put God First, you have Him at Last.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Smitty For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020), sojourner (10-13-2020)

  9. #15
    Administrator fuego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    16,273
    Thanked: 14129
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
    Satan knew if he could corrupt the lineal genealogy passed down through the centuries, Jesus would not be born from a pure bloodline.
    I mean what is a 'pure bloodline'? "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;"

    So, it makes sense to me that satan was behind the creation of the "giants" by commissioning fallen angels to copulate with women to "corrupt the seed" by bringing into existence an angel-human hybrid type of corrupt being "Nephilim" in hopes of corrupting the genealogy seed of which Jesus would be born from.
    Well I'm glad it 'makes sense' but I would like scriptural proof rather than speculation. :)

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fuego For This Useful Post:

    curly sue (10-05-2020), Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020), Quest (10-04-2020), tschau (10-05-2020)

  11. #16
    Super Moderator Quest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ashville, Alabama
    Posts
    5,920
    Thanked: 3402
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by fuego View Post
    I never really studied it. I knew Branham believed it. I just never saw any evidence of Eve and satan having sex if that's what it's saying.
    Another version...just as Mary did not 'have sex' with God some hold the view of a version of this...I have a friend who believes the demons possessed people and procreated their spiritual DNA so to speak. Sadly she has adopted this version of the elect...

    I do not believe angels themselves can have sex...Jesus stated otherwise and He did not state any alternative. He did not say some angels...He did not say they used to but not any more...and there are no other passages on the subject. I lean toward believing they possessed people and their sin altered their DNA similar to the teaching of Dr. Leaf.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Quest For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020)

  13. #17
    Administrator fuego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    16,273
    Thanked: 14129
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Quest View Post
    Not exactly...just as Mary did not 'have sex' with God some hold the view of a version of this...I have a friend who believes the demons possessed people and procreated their spiritual DNA so to speak. Sadly she has adopted this version of the elect...

    I do not believe angels themselves can have sex...Jesus stated otherwise and He did not state any alternative. He did not say some angels...He did not say they used to but not any more...and there are no other passages on the subject. I lean toward believing they possessed people and their sin altered their DNA similar to the teaching of Dr. Leaf.
    I find that more believable than spirits having sex with physical beings. But we don't have scripture for either really.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fuego For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020), tschau (10-05-2020)

  15. #18
    Senior Member Pentecali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    3,973
    Thanked: 2541
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal TT View Post
    I believe it's false teaching and Branham went into error
    I don't ascribe to serpent seed.

    I cannot get around Gen 4:1 where Adam knew Eve and bore Cain. I have not heard their explanation for this. How they explain this I don't know.

    I am on the fence on giants. I believe there were giants. David killed one. Joshua dealt with them. It was mentioned around the time of the flood. I'm not sure how they came into existence or why.

    I know people who personally believe the book of Enoch is infallible scripture.

    I don't think their belief in the giants & Enoch is something to fall out over though
    Last edited by Pentecali; 10-05-2020 at 12:49 PM.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Pentecali For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020)

  17. #19
    Senior Member Smitty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Everett, Washington
    Posts
    1,629
    Thanked: 1786
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by fuego View Post
    I mean what is a 'pure bloodline'? "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;"
    And I will put enmity (hatred, rancor, mutual antagonism, hostility) between you and the woman.
    And between your seed and her seed;
    He shall bruise you on the head,
    And you shall bruise him on the heel (Gen 3:15).

    Satan hated the woman because he knew a Redeemer would be born through her seed that would crush his head seal his eternal fate.
    The devils only hope was to contaminate her seed with his seed thus frustrating the flawless bloodline in which the Messiah would come from.
    With this in mind, you can see satans plan in corrupting the seed of the woman, with a fallen angelic DNA bloodline being produced through a half human, half fallen angel hybrid giant. If satan could infect the genealogy in which Jesus would come through with fallen angelic DNA he would save his own head.



    Quote Originally Posted by fuego View Post
    Well I'm glad it 'makes sense' but I would like scriptural proof rather than speculation. :)
    A widow, or a divorced woman, or one who is profaned by harlotry, these he may not take; but rather he is to marry a virgin of his own people;
    so that he will not defile his descendants among his people, For I am the Lord who sanctifies him. If the Lord required a pure blood line here in Leviticus 21:14-15, how much more would He require His Son to be born from unprofaned descendants thus the reason for the flood to end that fallen civilization.
    If you put God First, you have Him at Last.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Smitty For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020)

  19. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
    A widow, or a divorced woman, or one who is profaned by harlotry, these he may not take; but rather he is to marry a virgin of his own people;
    so that he will not defile his descendants among his people, For I am the Lord who sanctifies him. If the Lord required a pure blood line here in Leviticus 21:14-15, how much more would He require His Son to be born from unprofaned descendants thus the reason for the flood to end that fallen civilization.
    Tamar was Jacob's daughter in law when he impregnated her.
    Bathsheba was an adulteress.
    Then there was Manasseh who "shed very much innocent blood until he had filled Jerusalem from one end to another; besides his sin with which he made Judah sin, in doing evil in the sight of the Lord"
    And Amon his son, "did evil in the sight of the Lord, as Manasseh his father had done".

    Just saying.

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FunFromOz For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (10-05-2020), fuego (10-05-2020), Smitty (10-05-2020)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Be prepared for breakdowns with an extended service plan for your Buick. Many vehicle repairs can cost thousands of dollars in unexpected expense, now may be the time to consider an extended service plan for your vehicle.