Cardinal TT (05-10-2018)
It seems to me that women can be as abusive as men when they don't need physical superiority to make it work. If there had been gender equality throughout leadership then the level of abuse from women would probably have been similar to the level of abuse from men. Not higher, just similar.
It seems to me that male dominance in the Bible was more a question of the culture of those times than of God's will. Just like the practice of keeping slaves and even regulating slavery in the law (in a positive direction that is) were based on culture and not on God's will. Jesus made a point of talking to a Samaritan woman who wasn't even with her husband and he even did so in an informal manner Every last detail of that was outside the norms of that day and place. Some times the gospel produced liberty for women that they couldn't handle, the situation in the Corinthian church is a good example of that. Paul had to pull them back towards what the culture demanded or they would be acting out of rebellion rather than liberty in the Spirit. But the letters they received don't necessarily define the limits of liberty in the Spirit for women rather they addressed specific problems in that church. How far can liberty in the Spirit and (the ideal) "in Christ there is neither male nor female" be taken in practical reality ? Not so far that the genders cease to exist entirely except in a strictly sexual setting. That is going too far.
FaithfulOne (05-10-2018)
Jesus and the Samaritan woman is an example of God making a point in relation to cultural norms. Around the time of the Pentecostal revival he made a similar point by raising up Maria Woodworth-Etter to have what was probably at that time the most powerful evangelism and healing ministry in the nation or even on Earth and that was at a time when being a female minister was very difficult. She had sound doctrine and no scandals too. The same can be said about Aimee Semple McPherson, especially in terms of the size of her ministry. She eventually had some scandals but it didn't start out like that. What was God trying to tell us ? That his will for women involved far more liberty than the culture of that time promoted or even allowed, quite obviously.
What about today, is it still the same way ? Certainly not in general given the culture of absolutist gender equality but maybe in ways ?
FaithfulOne (05-10-2018)
Cardinal TT (05-10-2018)
I find it interesting that throughout the scriptures we see male leadership and the rare female....I often have heard the dismissal of that as 'male dominance and oppression of those historical times'. There is an element of truth, that God never viewed women as inferior, but He clearly does view men and women as different...not in the spiritual sense, there is no male nor female....but it has to be acknowledged He called 12 MEN...When He chose the 12 tribes He chose 12 SONS...
When we distinguish between the difference between the terms inferior and different this goes a long way in leveling the playing field of discussion.
Secondly as TT noted abuse of power is not gender restrictive....it's a human sin thing....
Cardinal TT (05-10-2018), curly sue (05-10-2018)
I have always been very leery of the argument that God's word was restricted by cultural norms...that God was restrained by them 'back then'.
The context of the Samaritan woman was religious division and perception of the purpose and worship of Messiah...the only issue speaking to her was she was a Samaritan...not that she was a 'woman'.
Jesus had women who accompanied His journey and they ministered to His needs and likely those of the disciples...
When Judas died a male replaced him in the inner circle...God could have made the statement right there...He could have chosen a woman...and had that been HIS Mind and will, He would have...
Cardinal TT (05-10-2018), Romans828 (05-10-2018)
John 4:27 And at this point His disciples came, and they marveled that He talked with a woman
They had their specific cultural ways of interacting, including in terms of mixed genders and what Jesus did in this passage was not within those norms.
Are you suggesting that the law's regulations on slavery reflect God's eternal best will for a society rather than his regulating the culture of that day and place in a positive direction without changing it entirely (yet) ? Be careful what you answer now, Quest.
Good point Quest
Jesus broke so many false cultural traditions that it angered the leaders....they were going to kill him anyway why not add one more and make half the apostles women
The fact is that male leadership is not a cultural thing it was created in the beginning with Adam
curly sue (05-10-2018)
Colonel
Are you saying slavery and male leadership are similar and both man made customs?