Where do you get that from?
It's not in "As he was traveling, it happened that he was approaching Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him;and he fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?”And he said, “Who are You, Sir?” And He said, “I am Jesus whom you are persecuting,but get up and enter the city, and it will be told you what you must do.”"
Jesus knocked Saul to the ground and while he was lying there told him to get to the city where he would be told WHAT he MUST DO. Saul got no choice about it.
It doesn't matter if Mormonism teaches about the goddess and such things, it has doctrines in common with Arminianism and therefore Arminianism is Mormonistic. Repent from your semi-Mormonism !
And Arminianism teaches that there is a God which is also part of Catholicism. Repent of your Catholicism.
And Hinduism teaches that there is a God
And Buddhism teaches that there is a God
etc.
What matters Colonel is that 1600 years ago the Christian Church rejected the idea that salvation is not entirely of God but that man plays a part in it.
(actually, I don't think Buddhism has a god)
There you go again... following catholics who don't follow God's written Word!What matters Colonel is that 1600 years ago the Christian Church rejected the idea that salvation is not entirely of God but that man plays a part in it.
So, how often do you speak to mutha mary anywhow?
Isn't bootyism where each person is their own god?actually, I don't think Buddhism has a god
FT perhaps you should go away and study a bit of History. Until the East-West Schism of 1054 all there was was the Catholic Church and in it's early days it's teaching were Biblical.
Protestantism only came into existence in the 16th century which is 500 years ago. One thousand years before that the church was quiet Christian and Biblically correct.
So clueless that some of the stuff you spout here is actually very Roman Catholic in origin; but then you know that because you know everything.
Not now, no. But that was early church teaching.
Or you misunderstood what I was trying to say.
No.
Definitions can differ depending on who you ask (and which side of the fence they're on) and there will be slight differences in the beliefs of two people sitting next to each other let alone formal church organisations.
However the extent to which one believes that salvation is a cooperative effort between man and God; the extent to which one believes that the ultimate final choice in salvation is with man; and the extent to which one believes God can be resisted, places one perhaps on the edge or perhaps in the middle of the (semi)Pelagian "camp".
All Arminians are in there somewhere as far as I can tell.