-
Senior Member
-
-
Senior Member
Awesome testimony about tongues at around the 58 min mark.
-
-
Senior Member
WOW! At 1:01 there is a real eye opener for us.
-
-
Senior Member
Never seen that Nemo movie. He talks about tithing for the first time and he concludes with the same thinking that I have been talking about here, that everything we are and have belongs to Jesus to begin with and there is no 90% to keep. Then there is such a thing as being lead by the Holy Spirit.
He talks about baptism in water again. I've seen all the 24 videos and he never addresses this verse or the chapter it is quoted from :
1 Cor 1:17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect.
I think it is good that he emphasizes baptism in water when so many downplay or ignore it but I find it a bit intellectually dishonest when he always avoids that specific scripture, it is not an obscure one. The honest thing to do would be to address it at all somewhere along the way.
His interpretation of Romans 10:9-10 is totally ridiculous since the context in verse 1 and 14 is getting unbelieving Israelites saved.
-
-
Administrator
Originally Posted by
Colonel
Never seen that Nemo movie. He talks about tithing for the first time and he concludes with the same thinking that I have been talking about here, that everything we are and have belongs to Jesus to begin with and there is no 90% to keep. Then there is such a thing as being lead by the Holy Spirit.
He talks about baptism in water again. I've seen all the 24 videos and he never addresses this verse or the chapter it is quoted from :
1 Cor 1:17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect.
I think it is good that he emphasizes baptism in water when so many downplay or ignore it but I find it a bit intellectually dishonest when he always avoids that specific scripture, it is not an obscure one. The honest thing to do would be to address it at all somewhere along the way.
His interpretation of Romans 10:9-10 is totally ridiculous since the context in verse 1 and 14 is getting unbelieving Israelites saved.
Paul did have people baptize for him, so he wasn't against it. I still think it's a good thing to have people baptize their own converts though in general if possible.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fuego For This Useful Post:
Ezekiel 33 (12-09-2016), Quest (12-09-2016)
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
fuego
Paul did have people baptize for him, so he wasn't against it. I still think it's a good thing to have people baptize their own converts though in general if possible.
I didn't bother to exegete the whole passage. It's obvious that people were generally baptized as they came to believe but Paul's statement makes water baptism far less than essential for salvation. I'm sure Søndergaard is nowhere near being a baptismal regenerationist (that's a theological term) but his avoidance of scriptures like that and his crazy interpretation of Romans 10:9-10 makes him seem closer to the borderline than he really is.
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Colonel
Never seen that Nemo movie. He talks about tithing for the first time and he concludes with the same thinking that I have been talking about here, that everything we are and have belongs to Jesus to begin with and there is no 90% to keep. Then there is such a thing as being lead by the Holy Spirit.
He talks about baptism in water again. I've seen all the 24 videos and he never addresses this verse or the chapter it is quoted from :
1 Cor 1:17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect.
I think it is good that he emphasizes baptism in water when so many downplay or ignore it but I find it a bit intellectually dishonest when he always avoids that specific scripture, it is not an obscure one. The honest thing to do would be to address it at all somewhere along the way.
His interpretation of Romans 10:9-10 is totally ridiculous since the context in verse 1 and 14 is getting unbelieving Israelites saved.
He did address that scripture. I will see if I can zero in on it for you.
-
-
Senior Member
It is at the 46 minute mark.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Ezekiel 33 For This Useful Post:
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Colonel
His interpretation of Romans 10:9-10 is totally ridiculous since the context in verse 1 and 14 is getting unbelieving Israelites saved.
Actually, if you read chapters 9 through 11 straight through, as Paul was expressing it instead of just picking those 2 "werses" out, it isn't totally ridiculous.
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Ezekiel 33
It is at the 46 minute mark.
Funny, I looked for it again after having watched the video first and still missed it. I'll look at it later when I can watch video.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Colonel For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Be prepared for breakdowns with a comprehensive service contract for your
Subaru. Many vehicle repairs can cost thousands of dollars in unexpected expense, now may be the time to consider an extended service plan for your vehicle.