Well this is for sure...UFO’s are still that.
fuego (07-02-2018)
I don't discount anything that God can do. Whether it be life on other planets, He IS the creator, or creation through evolution. (and THAT statement should open a can of worms) He's the author and perfector of it all.
Evolution as in survival of the fittest is a fact. The creatures that manage to procreate are the ones whose genes are passed on. Evolution as an explanation for history since the beginning is just an atheistic theory. There is a mix involved, creation and evolution.
To expand this into the realm of the OP, there are many outside factors that could have started, affected or supervised the natural processes, including God, angels, extraterrestrials (in theory).
No cans of worms necessary.
Evolution, properly understood, is an entirely random, purposeless, and unguided process.
"Theistic Evolution" is an absolute joke and a contradiction in terms.
It's like having a square circle.
You can't "front end load" an outcome in an inherently chaotic process.
However, "survival of the fittest" fits quite nicely within satan's kingdom and was manifested in Nazi Ideology.
.
This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
(Ephesians 4:17-18)
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
(Psalm 1)
This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
(Ephesians 4:17-18)
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
(Psalm 1)
Cardinal TT (07-02-2018)
It's basically how nature works and it seems that God doesn't step in to affect it much in the here and now. Maybe in subtle ways. Doesn't mean that it applies much to human beings except in the basic genetic sense and it certainly doesn't mean that that is how things have developed here on Earth from nothing and on. If one makes it difficult for birds of a certain color to survive because all of a sudden the environment changed and they are spotted easily by their predators then after a while those birds disappear and the others survive - and the only difference was the color. This has been observed and amounts to survival of the fittest.
This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
(Ephesians 4:17-18)
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
(Psalm 1)
Evolution (Darwinian evolution anyway, which is what most people mean when they use the word) is the belief that life began by random chance when the right chemical compounds came together billions of years ago to create the first single celled microbe which eventually evolved into all of the life forms that we see today. This is the basis for the belief in intelligent life and advanced civilizations throughout the galaxy. Natural selection (aka Survival of the fittest) is the mechanism through which evolution supposedly occurred. There is no question that natural selection is a valid process. We can observe mutation occurring in viruses and various life forms that brings about adaptation within the species. The question is whether or not natural selection can produce macro-evolution (going from one species to another) rather than simple micro-evolution (adaptation within the species). But more importantly, as was pointed out in the video by Stephen Meyers, does the idea that a single celled organism can form by random chance even pass the giggle test in the first place?