Let me put it this way, the ones at the top are smart, and they are evil, but they ain't that smart.
Remember the Tower of Babel.
They can only go as far as God allows.
Let me put it this way, the ones at the top are smart, and they are evil, but they ain't that smart.
Remember the Tower of Babel.
They can only go as far as God allows.
This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
(Ephesians 4:17-18)
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
(Psalm 1)
I agree with you there. In media when I hear someone described as "smart", I think psychopath, the "new smart".Originally Posted by GodismyJudge
Someone wants you to believe what you are writing in this thread.
I stay pretty current technically Colonel, as of yet genuine AI simply doesn't exit. It's a buzzword and more importantly it's a pre-emptive excuse for all manner of bad (human) behavior.
They are floating trial balloons to see if they can sucker everyone with "the robot did it". My guess is they will succeed.
Only believe! They like it like it like that.
Google AI Researcher Accused of Sexual Harassment
By Mark Bergen and Jeremy Kahn
December 15, 2017, 5:03 PM MST
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...iling-ai-field
Sexual harassment accusations have hit another corner of the tech industry, with allegations involving prominent artificial intelligence researchers, including one at Google, a leader in the field.
Data scientist Kristian Lum wrote in a blog this week that a man she called "S" grabbed her inappropriately at an industry conference in 2010 and said he took advantage of another woman she didn't identify on separate occasions. Two people who were told about the conduct from two alleged victims told Bloomberg the man is Steven Scott, a senior researcher at Google.
Lum also wrote that a well-respected academic touched her inappropriately on the leg at the same conference and later sent her innuendo-laced messages. The man was later identified as Bradley Carlin, an expert in biostatistics, by people familiar with the alleged conduct....
....The researchers involved are experts in Bayesian statistics, which underpins a powerful type of AI known as machine learning. The accusations have surfaced during a growing debate over the lack of diversity among machine learning researchers and whether computer scientists are paying enough attention to bias – including gender and racial bias – in the data sets they are using to train AI systems.....
Garbage in, Garbage out.
.
This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
(Ephesians 4:17-18)
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
(Psalm 1)
This may be a little long for some folks to watch, but it explains some things about what nobody actually knows about it and how it is being used..
How Machines Learn
This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
(Ephesians 4:17-18)
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
(Psalm 1)
Colonel (12-20-2017)
Very entertaining video !
GodismyJudge (12-20-2017)
The video describes a successful algorithm for image identification but the truth is more like...
http://www.newsweek.com/british-poli...nsavers-752005British cops hope that within two or three years, artificial intelligence will be able to spare humans from the horrific trauma that comes with pouring through tens of thousands of images of potential child abuse. The digital forensics department of the Metropolitan Police can already scan successfully for things like guns or drugs, but according to the Telegraph it has a little work left to do when it comes to spotting child pornography.
"Sometimes it comes up with a desert and it thinks its an indecent image or pornography,” Mark Stokes, the Met's head of digital and electronics forensics, told the Telegraph. "For some reason, lots of people have screen-savers of deserts and it picks it up thinking it is skin color."
I wonder how many innocent people ended up in a pedophile database due to having the wrong screen saver?
Note the blame shifting ..."For some reason...", blame successfully shifted to algorithm. The "reason" is because AI does not exist, computers do what they are told to do.
But what about Data from Star Trek TNG?
Christ's Victory Bible Teaching Center
Web site: http://www.cvbibleteachingcenter.org
Vindicating God Ministries
(A Unique New Bible Teaching Ministry)
Web site: http://www.vindicatinggod.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/vindicatinggod
Gab: https://gab.com/victoriousword
Minds: https://www.minds.com/victoriousword/
MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/troyedwards15
Yeah, there is no artificial 'intelligence'. Is just a learned behavior of patterns as learned by a machine. Now could a machine be programmed to 'learn' in such a way that it might make wrong choices that would be bad for whatever the computer is tied into? Sure. But it's still not 'intelligence' in any shape of form. AI is and always will be a thing of science fiction.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote