Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46

Thread: Early Treatment Works, Period

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Pentecali View Post
    Same here. You just have to take it early on with C, zinc, D etc.

    We all know why big pharma is against it .. $$$$$$
    My brother was 5 days into it and doesn't take any supps that I'm aware of.

    Like Fuego, I didn't take anything to get me through it.

  2. #12
    Frozen Chosen A.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    8,050
    Thanked: 6091
    Quote Originally Posted by tschau View Post
    No,
    about half of the colds are caused by a corona- virus, but it is a different one and does not cause a positiv test

    Tap water, coke , red bull, etc will all cause a false test result because they change the ph level in the sample.
    You can not expect a valid result by doing a test wrong.
    Yes... sorry ... that's what I meant. One of the coronas.

    And yes, it will test positive.

  3. #13
    the tap water?

  4. #14
    Frozen Chosen A.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    8,050
    Thanked: 6091
    Quote Originally Posted by tschau View Post
    the tap water?
    A common cold.

  5. #15

  6. #16
    Frozen Chosen A.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    8,050
    Thanked: 6091
    Quote Originally Posted by tschau View Post
    no
    Everyone knows that the pcr is a fraudulent "test" for corona viruses ... it was never meant to diagnose. So, yes, a common cold will show a positive for covid.

  7. #17

  8. #18
    Frozen Chosen A.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    8,050
    Thanked: 6091
    Quote Originally Posted by tschau View Post
    no
    Whatever.

    I know what I've read and heard.

    The PCR is a test that was never meant to diagnose. Period. Even the man who created it said so.

    It creates false positives because it can be severely manipulated.

    Therefore, just about anything can be tested as positive.

    Including the common cold, various fruits and other things that have actually been sent in for testing.

    Modern medicine is not infallible. And the "science" of the PCR "test" to diagnose is completely invalid.

  9. #19
    again, if you use a test wrongly, the result can be positiv or negativ, but it is in all cases wrong.
    There are many different corona viruses, and half of the common colds people have are caused by corona virus.
    In the specific test for Covid-19 diagnosis they do notuse the whole coronavirus, but only the specific part of the gen, that is unique, = different from the other
    corona virus
    There is a 1-2% of possibility to get a wrong diagnois, there are more negativ then positiv wrong.
    (you can use orange juice on a pregnancy test, whatever result you receive is wrong)
    The standard today is that a positiv test must be done again and confirmed before giving out.

    Now, we live in the time of the year where may catch a cold. If the test would react positiv, we would see a much bigger percentage of positiv tests, wich we not do.

    I fully agree that
    Modern medicine is not infallible.
    Also medical technic is fallible
    and docs and nurse can make mistakes, that is true.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to tschau For This Useful Post:

    njtom (02-01-2022)

  11. #20
    And the "science" of the PCR "test" to diagnose is completely invalid.
    The posts have been shared over 1,000 times on Facebook (here , here , here).

    The post begins with the words "COVID-19 TEST a FRAUD?", then introduces the alleged quote from Mullis, who invented the PCR method in 1985 and was recognized for this achievement by being awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 (here).

    However, the quote is actually from an article written by John Lauritsen in December 1996 about HIV and AIDS, not COVID-19 (here).The context around the quote shows Lauritsen is not saying PCR tests do not work. Instead, he is clarifying that PCR identifies substances qualitatively not quantitatively, detecting the genetic sequences of viruses, but not the viruses themselves: "PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves."
    Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn't say it can't be used in virus detection | Reuters

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Has your Volkswagen CC warranty expired? Get a fast online quote from CarWarrantyUS today. Enjoy the open road and leave the repairs to us.