Whatever.
I know what I've read and heard.
The PCR is a test that was never meant to diagnose. Period. Even the man who created it said so.
It creates false positives because it can be severely manipulated.
Therefore, just about anything can be tested as positive.
Including the common cold, various fruits and other things that have actually been sent in for testing.
Modern medicine is not infallible. And the "science" of the PCR "test" to diagnose is completely invalid.
again, if you use a test wrongly, the result can be positiv or negativ, but it is in all cases wrong.
There are many different corona viruses, and half of the common colds people have are caused by corona virus.
In the specific test for Covid-19 diagnosis they do notuse the whole coronavirus, but only the specific part of the gen, that is unique, = different from the other
corona virus
There is a 1-2% of possibility to get a wrong diagnois, there are more negativ then positiv wrong.
(you can use orange juice on a pregnancy test, whatever result you receive is wrong)
The standard today is that a positiv test must be done again and confirmed before giving out.
Now, we live in the time of the year where may catch a cold. If the test would react positiv, we would see a much bigger percentage of positiv tests, wich we not do.
I fully agree thatAlso medical technic is fallibleModern medicine is not infallible.
and docs and nurse can make mistakes, that is true.
njtom (02-01-2022)
And the "science" of the PCR "test" to diagnose is completely invalid.Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn't say it can't be used in virus detection | ReutersThe posts have been shared over 1,000 times on Facebook (here , here , here).
The post begins with the words "COVID-19 TEST a FRAUD?", then introduces the alleged quote from Mullis, who invented the PCR method in 1985 and was recognized for this achievement by being awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 (here).
However, the quote is actually from an article written by John Lauritsen in December 1996 about HIV and AIDS, not COVID-19 (here).The context around the quote shows Lauritsen is not saying PCR tests do not work. Instead, he is clarifying that PCR identifies substances qualitatively not quantitatively, detecting the genetic sequences of viruses, but not the viruses themselves: "PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves."