Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: massive decline in gun violence in the United States

  1. #1
    Frozen Chosen A.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    8,050
    Thanked: 6089

    massive decline in gun violence in the United States

    We’ve had a massive decline in gun violence in the United States. Here’s why.

    By Max Ehrenfreund December 3

    Premeditated mass shootings in public places are happening more often, some researchers say, plunging towns and cities into grief and riveting the attention of a horrified nation. In general, though, fewer Americans are dying as a result of gun violence — a shift that began about two decades ago.

    (See article for graph)

    In 1993, there were seven homicides by firearm for every 100,000 Americans, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. By 2013, that figure had fallen by nearly half, to 3.6 — a total of 11,208 firearm homicides. The number of victims of crimes involving guns that did not result in death (such as robberies) declined even more precipitously, from 725 per 100,000 people in 1993 to 175 in 2013.

    Older data suggests that gun violence might have been even more widespread previously. The rate of murder and manslaughter excluding negligence reached an apex in 1980, according to the FBI. That year, there were 10.8 willful killings per 100,000 people. Although not a perfect measure of the overall rate of gun violence, the decline in the rate of murder and manslaughter is suggestive: Two in three homicides these days are committed with guns.

    This decline in gun violence is part of an overall decline in violent crime. According to the FBI's data, the national rate of violent crime has decreased 49 percent since its apex in 1991. Even as a certain type of mass shooting is apparently becoming more frequent, America has become a much less violent place.

    Much of the decline in violence is still unexplained, but researchers have identified several reasons for the shift. Here are five.


    1. More police officers on the beat

    Additional manpower helps police departments respond to and prevent violence. In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed a major crime bill that set aside enough federal funding for law enforcement agencies nationally to add 100,000 officers, though the ranks of the country's police forces had already been expanding as local governments dedicated more resources to their departments to control increasing rates of crime.
    In New York City, the recruitment of more officers was a crucial reason that the decline in crime was larger and more sustained than in other cities, according to Franklin Zimring, a criminologist at the University of California at Berkeley. The economist Steven Levitt estimates that larger police forces reduced crime by 5 percent to 6 percent. Gun violence, presumably, declined along with crime in general.

    2. Police using computers

    It wasn't just that police departments hired more people. They also started using computers to collect data on crime and...

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...tes-heres-why/

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Quest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ashville, Alabama
    Posts
    5,920
    Thanked: 3402
    Blog Entries
    2
    I was just thinking of the gangs and gang violence you USED to hear about..not to mention the mobsters and their retaliations..

  3. #3
    Yes, thank God, our crime rate has diminished significantly since the early 1990's.

  4. #4
    Depends on where you live. The Mexican drug cartels have literally taken over entire neighborhoods in parts of Cali and rule the neighborhood with fear. Frankly, I would never live in places like Camden, NJ, Chicago, Oakland CA, St. Louis, etc.....

    The crime rate (homicides) is going up NYC under mayor Di Blasio.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Quest View Post
    I was just thinking of the gangs and gang violence you USED to hear about..not to mention the mobsters and their retaliations..
    Gang violence in Portland breaks record
    As of September 1, 2015, there have been 121 acts of gang violence in the City of Portland

    I didn't look at Chicago, which I am near. I do know that police, in many cities, do not publicly release information about gangs like they used to. They don't want to give credit to particular gangs for crimes. They have found that it actually increases notoriety, gang recruitment, and gang strength. It is included in government required statistics and court trials, but it isn't spread out on the front page like it used to be.
    See avatar for signature

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to papabrett For This Useful Post:

    Quest (12-07-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •