Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: We Had the Vaccine from the Start—You Just Weren't Allowed to Take It

  1. #1

    We Had the Vaccine from the Start—You Just Weren't Allowed to Take It

    Don't know about the degree of veracity of this...


    We Had the Vaccine from the Start—You Just Weren't Allowed to Take It

    For the duration of the pandemic, while hundreds of thousands died and the world economy was decimated by lockdowns, Moderna's highly effective vaccine was available.

    Tuesday, December 22, 2020
    We Had the Vaccine from the Start—You Just Weren't Allowed to Take It - Foundation for Economic Education


    Few people realize that the Moderna vaccine against COVID-19—which the FDA has finally declared "highly effective," and which is now being distributed to Americans—has actually been available for nearly a year.

    But the government wouldn't let you take it.

    The vaccine, a triumph of medical science known as mRNA-1273, was designed in a single weekend, just two days after Chinese researchers published the virus's genetic code on January 11, 2020.

    For the entire duration of the pandemic, while hundreds of thousands died and the world economy was decimated by lockdowns, this highly effective vaccine has been available.

    But you, and all the people who died, were prohibited by the government from taking it.

    There are some who claim that the FDA "saves lives" by putting the brakes on medical innovation with their requirements for years-long, and often decades-long, billion-dollar medical trial procedures.

    Missing here is the obvious counterpoint—How many lives did the FDA sacrifice to disease in the meantime?

    In the case of COVID-19 we know the answer: more than 300,000 deaths so far in the United States and counting.

    So why was this vaccine delayed for a full year? Because the FDA prohibited rapid "challenge trials"—where volunteers take the vaccine and then expose themselves to the virus in a lab, rather than waiting agonizing months to see how many catch the virus "in the wild."

    Challenge trials would have proven the vaccine's effectiveness in a matter of weeks. But the FDA considered the risk to trial volunteers too high.

    But why? Why are hundreds of thousands of "natural" deaths from a rampaging disease considered acceptable to the FDA—while the remote possibility of one or two deaths, in the absolute worst case scenario, among well-informed vaccine-testing volunteers are not?

    There is no rational answer. The tragic truth is that we are ruled by a cowardly medical bureaucracy, one that would rather allow hundreds of thousands of people to die than face any potential criticism for allowing an accelerated vaccine trial.

    By contrast, in a free society, immediately after the vaccine was created, volunteers would have been allowed to participate in challenge trials. The trials would have been conducted either by the vaccine company itself, or more likely by third-party medical-trial specialists, to remove any concerns about bias in the results.

    As each challenge group proved successful, the number of volunteers for the next group would grow. Week by week the challenge groups would grow larger, until after just a few months—instead of taking nearly a year by the FDA's "in the wild" method—the results would be definitive and the trials complete.

    This means that in March or April of 2020—instead of the first wave of COVID deaths and lockdowns in the United States—we could have seen a wide vaccine rollout, leading to rapid herd immunity, nipping the pandemic in the bud.

    But that path would have been possible only in a free society....









    This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
    (Ephesians 4:17-18)

    Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
    (Psalm 1)

  2. #2
    how much nonsense

    The vaccine, a triumph of medical science known as mRNA-1273, was designed in a single weekend, just two days after Chinese researchers published the virus's genetic code on January 11, 2020.
    If you built a house, you may take only a weekend to have the idea how it could look like, but can you move in an monday?


    The tragic truth is that we are ruled by a cowardly medical bureaucracy,
    does anybody volunteer to take a vaccination that has not been tested ? and if no, does that make him a coward?
    Usually the critic is, that maybe not enough testing has been done.

  3. #3
    So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    7,824
    Thanked: 7519
    We weren't allowed Hydroxychloroquine either. Malaria pills, known to be one of the safest medicines in existence suddenly became "dangerous".

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John For This Useful Post:

    FireBrand (12-23-2020), Romans828 (12-23-2020)

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by John View Post
    We weren't allowed Hydroxychloroquine either. Malaria pills, known to be one of the safest medicines in existence suddenly became "dangerous".
    Our Herr Whitmer prohibited the treatment of Hydroxychloroquine from the start and threatened doctors with prosecution. Yes, this and so many other constricting regulations from people that are clueless but want to feel like they know something.

    Welcome to globalist answers to local questions. Welcome to socialist control.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to FireBrand For This Useful Post:

    Highly Favoured (12-23-2020)

  7. #5
    what do you believe, was the vaccine tested to long?
    What would have been the reason of the Trump administration to prohibited the US citizens from taking it?

  8. #6
    Ok, vaccine was approved too slow or vaccine was approved too fast? Pick a side! The vaccine did not get "held back" it went through the necessary study phases to determine safety and efficacy in record time I might add! You really think exposing people on purpose to a virus that we STILL don't know all the long term health ramifications is ethical? I would have participated in the Moderna trial (it filled up pretty quickly) but I would not have signed on if I knew I would be exposed, that would be immoral. Besides, they would never expose a control group to the virus, so they would not get the necessary data to approve by FDA standards.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
You can forget about unexpected repair costs with an extended service contract for your Saab. Many vehicle repairs can cost thousands of dollars in unexpected expense, now may be the time to consider an extended service plan for your vehicle.