Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Show the Graphs, Mr. President! - Industrial-Level Fraud Hidden in Plain View

  1. #1

    Show the Graphs, Mr. President! - Industrial-Level Fraud Hidden in Plain View

    Graphs at link...


    Show the Graphs, Mr. President!

    Industrial-Level Fraud Hidden in Plain View

    By Michael Del Rosso
    Published on November 19, 2020
    Show the Graphs, Mr. President! | The Stream


    The mainstream media have summarily rejected President Donald Trump's claims of election fraud as "unsubstantiated" and called the election for Vice-President Biden — although recounts, possible vote audits and litigation in numerous states are still pending. Even Republicans have expressed skepticism about the President's claims. They have called on him not only to assert that voter fraud has occurred, but also to present evidence of such fraud and, critically, to show that enough fraud occurred to make a difference in key battleground states.

    To date, the President's legal team has presented eyewitness evidence of procedural irregularities in many voting locations, particularly in Philadelphia, Detroit and Atlanta — where, for example, Republican poll watchers were denied the ability to observe the counting of late-arriving ballots. Nevertheless, these reports of procedural irregularities have not yet conveyed the full scale of the fraud that likely occurred. Thus, to meet the challenge his critics have posed, the President and his team need to present a different kind of evidence altogether — and soon.

    Fortunately for the President, there is plenty of evidence — much of it hiding in plain view — that can help to establish the scope of the likely fraud.

    Since Wednesday morning, November 4, numerous statistical anomalies have emerged from the analysis of vote tallies in key battleground states — each, oddly, where the President previously had large leads. These anomalies, individually and collectively, constitute an unmistakable statistical signature of intentional manipulation of the vote — i.e., fraud.

    Presenting these anomalies — in conjunction with evidence of local procedural irregularities and compromised voting machines and software — will allow the President and his team to make a compelling case to the public, state legislatures and the courts that fraud has occurred on a scale that casts doubt on the legitimacy of the vote in contested battleground states. Moreover, since the statistical evidence is already publicly available, it can be presented to the public now without compromising the strength of the Trump team's ongoing legal cases.

    Abrupt Spikes in Votes for Biden

    Consider just one such statistical anomaly: the abrupt vertical spikes in the Biden vote in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

    Late Tuesday, election night vote counting inexplicably stopped in critical battleground states — including Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. At the time, the President had sizable leads in Wisconsin and Michigan and an overwhelming 14% and 700,000 vote lead in Pennsylvania. Then, first at 3:42 am and again just after 6:00 am Wednesday morning, two huge batches of new Biden votes were suddenly tallied in Wisconsin and Michigan, respectively.

    At the time, in Wisconsin, Trump had been holding a commanding 3.6%, 108,656 vote lead, with over 3 million votes already counted. Moreover, he had held a consistent lead of 4% or more for over seven hours since the polls had closed. Then, a sudden spike in the number of Biden votes completely wiped out the Trump lead in a split second. This spike was produced by a huge dump of 168,542 votes (5% of the state total) that included 143,379 (or fully 85% of the batch) for Biden.

    In Michigan two hours later,
    138,339 new Biden votes were suddenly added to his tally without any new Trump votes included. These votes, and a subsequent Biden surge, eliminated most of the roughly 5% lead the President had been holding there at the time....



    ...Possible Explanations Fall Short

    The mainstream press has widely reported that the 138,339 Biden-only vote surge in the Michigan vote resulted from an innocently misplaced decimal point that exaggerated the Biden-only surge by a factor of 10 and that the "typo" has subsequently been corrected. Curiously, by their own counting that would still leave a surge of roughly 14,000 Biden-only votes mysteriously appearing early Wednesday morning. Even so, Michigan state election officials have not offered a convincing explanation of how, given that supposed correction, Biden was still able to vanquish Trump's 5%, 208,000 vote lead so quickly or why Trump never regained his lead — even temporarily — after the supposed correction. Nor have they explained why no discernable abrupt subtraction in the Biden vote was ever reported as new vote tallies came in. Moreover, subsequent analysis by data scientists have shown not one, but two, distinct large discontinuous jumps in the Biden vote in Michigan....




    ...Many Other Improbable Anomalies

    And, of course, many other statistically improbable anomalies have been noticed in contested states.

    For example, consider the following:


    (1) There are tens of thousands of ballots that include only votes for Biden and no other down-ballot Democratic candidates in battleground states. In Georgia alone, 95,801 such Biden-only democratic ballots have been identified.

    (2) Biden had a hugely disproportionate advantage in absentee voting in Pennsylvania and Michigan compared to his much smaller advantage in such voting in all other states.

    (3) There was unprecedented (89%) turnout rates in Wisconsin and fraudulent turnout levels (> 100%) in many Milwaukee wards and similarly unprecedented turnout levels in key precincts in Philadelphia.

    (4) There was almost entirely unidirectional slippage in Trump's margins after counting of late ballots resumed in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. And this was without many temporary jags or increases in Trump's direction as would be expected from an ordinary process of reporting the vote.

    (5) Biden had a lopsided lead in late counting of mail-in ballots in Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia despite Republican advantages (43%-35% in Wisconsin, for example) in requests for, and returns of, such ballots.

    (6) Pennsylvania had a historically and extremely low percentage of rejected mail-in ballots (1/30th the usual rate).

    (7) Trump vote margins dropped steadily Thursday after election day in Pennsylvania and Georgia as new Biden votes were apparently found and yet this didn't seem to change the percentage of the vote counted.

    (8) 19 of the 20 most reliable bell weather counties in the country voted for Trump.

    (9) Biden beat Trump in battleground states despite across-the-board down ballot Republican success in Senate, House and state legislative races.

    (10) Finally, Biden outpolled Barack Obama — the most popular Democratic president since John Kennedy — in key counties in battleground states. This was despite historically-low pre-vote measures of enthusiasm for his candidacy. In Pennsylvania, for example, Biden received between 24% and 43% more votes than Obama did in 2012 in the crucial counties of Chester, Cumberland and Montgomery despite extremely modest population growth in those counties;

    Presenting the Statistical Evidence

    Any one of these (and other) identified statistical anomalies should raise suspicion of fraud since these patterns would have been unlikely absent some intentional manipulation of the vote. Yet to suppose that all of these anomalies in contested battleground states occurred without major interventions strains credulity — in the extreme.

    The Trump legal and campaign team needs to present the media with this statistical evidence, and share it with the public now. This will help cast doubt on the legitimacy of the vote in contested states in a way that simply spotlighting local procedural irregularities cannot.

    Highlighting these statistical anomalies visually with easy to understand charts (see examples above) will also allow the campaign to put the Biden team on the defensive and allow team Trump to retrieve the moral high ground. That in turn will buy the president's team time to make a more comprehensive, multifaceted legal case that may include not only statistical evidence of fraud, but evidence about the suspicious design and manipulation of voting machines, the back-dating of ballots, the counting of legal and illegal mail-in ballots in secret, dead people voting and other egregious irregularities.

    Even before making that legal case, however, the Trump campaign should consider presenting evident statistical anomalies to the public and state legislatures. Doing so will build support for both legal and legislative remedies for the industrial-scale fraud that has — in all likelihood — taken place.











    This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity (futility) of their mind, having the understanding darkened...
    (Ephesians 4:17-18)

    Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...
    (Psalm 1)

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GodismyJudge For This Useful Post:

    Ezekiel 33 (11-19-2020), victoryword (11-19-2020)

  3. #2

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Ezekiel 33 For This Useful Post:

    GodismyJudge (11-19-2020)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
You can avoid major, expensive repair costs with an extended service plan for your Chevrolet. We have plans for all Chevy Models, including the Chevrolet Cruze.