Thread: Trump Declares Biden Pardons NULL and VOID

President Trump said early Monday that he was voiding all the last-minute pardons former President Joe Biden made using autopen.

"The 'Pardons' that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen," Trump posted on Truth Social early Monday morning.

"In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them!" he said of the oldest-ever president and concerns at his age-related mental abilities at 82.

Trump says Biden's autopen pardons are now 'void'

This is getting pretty crazy. First a "preemptive pardon" from Biden and now a "pardon anullment" based on an allegation that he probably cannot prove (Biden didn't sign his pardoning of his own son personally?!) How will all of this fare legally??

Originally Posted by Colonel

This is getting pretty crazy. First a "preemptive pardon" from Biden and now a "pardon anullment" based on an allegation that he probably cannot prove (Biden didn't sign his pardoning of his own son personally?!) How will all of this fare legally??

I don't think Hunter is included in this group. These were for the flurry of pardons issued before Trump's inauguration. They can tell which are not Joe Biden's signatures.

If they prove the signature's are a forgery, Fauci is in big trouble

Originally Posted by Susan

I don't think Hunter is included in this group. These were for the flurry of pardons issued before Trump's inauguration. They can tell which are not Joe Biden's signatures.

The allegation seems to be that the signutures are copies of each other rather than outright forgeries.

Originally Posted by Colonel

The allegation seems to be that the signutures are copies of each other rather than outright forgeries.

Same effect. Null and void. Go after em.

Originally Posted by Colonel

The allegation seems to be that the signutures are copies of each other rather than outright forgeries.

The allegation is that autopen was used, which means that Joe Biden was not present at the signing. If true, it's incredible how much the White House staff were running amok. I understand that autopen is more like a rubber stamp, unlike Docusign which is an electronic signature that can be tracked.

Originally Posted by Susan

The allegation is that autopen was used, which means that Joe Biden was not present at the signing. If true, it's incredible how much the White House staff were running amok. I understand that autopen is more like a rubber stamp, unlike Docusign which is an electronic signature that can be tracked.

I doubt that this is going anywhere :

"An internal memo by Trump Staff Secretary William Scharf described the Trump White House as having more stringent rules around autopen use than other administrations.

"Our practice around autopen usage is far more restrictive than most previous administrations. We do not use the autopen for documents that exercise the powers of the Presidency," Scharf wrote according to the memo seen by the New York Post Thursday.

He later added: "We will occasionally use the autopen when a single document requires multiple presidential signatures, or when multiple copies of a single document require signing, but only after the President has personally signed off and only at his direction."