-
Administrator
Tucker Carlson Breaks Down the Persecution of Donald Trump
Tucker Carlson Breaks Down the Lawfare Constructed, Banana Republic, Persecution of Donald Trump
For his opening monologue tonight, Fox News host Tucker Carlson breaks down the Manhattan case against President Trump as constructed by District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Carlson notes and contrasts recent -almost identical situations- involving former Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards, and later Hillary Clinton. The legal merits of the campaign finance case are farcical on their face as admitted by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), previously litigated via legal precedent (John Edwards), and even Supreme Court interpretation (VA Gov Bob McDonnell).
Additionally, even if there was a legal issue, there isn't, the statute of limitations on the claimed infraction has expired. Furthermore, and seemingly overlooked by most pundits opining on the issue, the legal issue Bragg is attempting to weaponize is a federal campaign finance issue, out of the jurisdiction of the Manhattan district attorney. So, what gives?
Why would George Soros funded District Attorney Alvin Bragg proceed with a case that was structurally designed to fail on every aspect of the case? The answer, 'politics', pure banana republic politics. Tucker Carlson, explains....
Read more:
Tucker Carlson Breaks Down the Lawfare Constructed, Banana Republic, Persecution of Donald Trump - The Last Refuge
-
The Following User Says Thank You to victoryword For This Useful Post:
-
So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.
Tucker is hitting on all cylinders, likely the ONLY main stream journalist out there.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to John For This Useful Post:
-
Administrator
Their obsession with him is literal insanity.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to fuego For This Useful Post:
-
Administrator
I haven't watched FOX News (intentionally) in years (when I used to work at a certain office they played it but I tuned it out. If I did watch them, Tucker would probably be the only one I would watch at this point, though not sure if I could fully trust any journalist or so-called conservative talking head right now.
-
-
So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.
Originally Posted by
victoryword
I haven't watched FOX News (intentionally) in years (when I used to work at a certain office they played it but I tuned it out. If I did watch them, Tucker would probably be the only one I would watch at this point, though not sure if I could fully trust any journalist or so-called conservative talking head right now.
I watch exactly one show - Tucker. The rest of it is still a mess of neo-cons, RINOs, etc.
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
John
I watch exactly one show - Tucker. The rest of it is still a mess of neo-cons, RINOs, etc.
Thou doth gerneralizeth much :)
Laura Ingram is definitely not a neo-con or a RINO , Hannity is arguably the most pro-Trump, Tucker has actually been the most critical of Trump so methinks you should revisit this puritanical stance of yours
While its true that the network executives (murdochs) are RINOs the Anchors are not .
Levin is a constitutional walking encyclopedia and the English Guy .. (forgot his name) is definitely no RINO
Conservatives need to stop being so puritan, yes we may have minor differences but they pale in comparison to the bigger fight that we face .
Truth is most of the Liberals , RINOS and NeoCons that used to be on Fox are GONE ...
-
-
So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.
Originally Posted by
BAP
Thou doth gerneralizeth much :)
Laura Ingram is definitely not a neo-con or a RINO , Hannity is arguably the most pro-Trump, Tucker has actually been the most critical of Trump so methinks you should revisit this puritanical stance of yours
While its true that the network executives (murdochs) are RINOs the Anchors are not .
Levin is a constitutional walking encyclopedia and the English Guy .. (forgot his name) is definitely no RINO
Conservatives need to stop being so puritan, yes we may have minor differences but they pale in comparison to the bigger fight that we face .
Truth is most of the Liberals , RINOS and NeoCons that used to be on Fox are GONE ...
Hannity still entertains war-mongers and deep state types, the war stuff is as bad as the woke stuff IMO, it's just mind control, propaganda. I mentioned Tucker in the context of "journalism", he seems to be doing pretty good with it, Ingraham might be OK but you have to endure an hour of Hannity before she comes on.
-
-
Administrator
Originally Posted by
BAP
Thou doth gerneralizeth much :)
Laura Ingram is definitely not a neo-con or a RINO , Hannity is arguably the most pro-Trump, Tucker has actually been the most critical of Trump so methinks you should revisit this puritanical stance of yours
While its true that the network executives (murdochs) are RINOs the Anchors are not .
Levin is a constitutional walking encyclopedia and the English Guy .. (forgot his name) is definitely no RINO
Conservatives need to stop being so puritan, yes we may have minor differences but they pale in comparison to the bigger fight that we face .
Truth is most of the Liberals , RINOS and NeoCons that used to be on Fox are GONE ...
Only going by what I THINK I remember reading, but weren't a lot of the people you just mentioned going against Trump's claims that the 2020 election was fraudulent? Weren't some of them wanting Trump to back down from this?
Again, going by what I thought had been the case, so not trying to argue. Just looking for affirmation or correction.
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
victoryword
Only going by what I THINK I remember reading, but weren't a lot of the people you just mentioned going against Trump's claims that the 2020 election was fraudulent? Weren't some of them wanting Trump to back down from this?
Again, going by what I thought had been the case, so not trying to argue. Just looking for affirmation or correction.
The only person who really came out against the claims incidentally was Tucker . I remember him getting on Sidney Powell for not providing proof at the time ..
Truth is there were many friendly voices to Trump on Fox in the aftermath of the election. Some like Hegsweth wouldn't even refer to Biden as President Elect until all legal challenges were exhausted .So much so taht Many of the liberals' like Shep Smith quit in protest because they felt the network wasn't clamping down enough on the pro-Trumpers
It was the aforementioned Network Executives who clamped down on any of the anchors being allowed to make the Claim supposedly because they were afraid of possible legal ramifications
Pretty much all of them including Tucker now agree that the election was stolen or at least manipulated and they proclaim it loudly
-
The Following User Says Thank You to BAP For This Useful Post:
-
Administrator
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Has your
Ford Mustang extended warranty warranty expired? Get a fast online quote from CarWarrantyUS today. Enjoy the open road and leave the repairs to us.