Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Sidney Powell Drops The Legal Hammer In Georgia

  1. #1
    Frozen Chosen A.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    8,050
    Thanked: 6089

    Sidney Powell Drops The Legal Hammer In Georgia

    Sidney Powell Drops The Legal Hammer In Georgia - Here's The Full Lawsuit And Details


    Supporters of President Donald Trump have waited patiently for a week to see what prominent defense attorney Sidney Powell would do after promising that she would file a "biblical" lawsuit in the state of Georgia.

    Late on Thanksgiving Eve, as was promised earlier in the day, Powell delivered, filling a massive lawsuit in Georgia and one in Michigan as well, where she — and other lawyers working for an affiliate with Trump — allege that the most egregious acts of voter and ballot fraud took place.

    Just The News has summarized Powell's Georgia lawsuit, in which it appears that the high-powered attorney is going for gold.

    The lawsuit, which was filed against Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and other state election officials, seeks to block the transmittal of the certified election results from going to the electoral college, presumably to give Powell and Trump's lawyers time to present what appears to be loads of evidence against the state.

    In the complaint, which is over 100 pages long, Powell asks for "prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering."

    Toward the beginning of the civil lawsuit, Powell lays out what she believes happened in Georgia that gave former Vice President Joe Biden a win in the traditionally-red state.

    "The fraud was executed by many means, but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious is the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned 'ballot-stuffing,'" Powell's suit alleged. "It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. Mathematical and statistical anomalies rising to the level of impossibilities, as shown by affidavits of multiple witnesses, documentation, and expert testimony evince this scheme across the state of Georgia."

    Here are five allegations that stick out, which if proven true and acted upon, could definitely be a huge win for Trump and his tens of millions of supporters.

    At least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards by the voter. "Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded," the suit said.

    Kemp and Raffensperger "rushed through the purchase of Dominion voting machines and software in 2019 for the 2020 Presidential Election" without due diligence and disregarded safety concerns.

    "There is incontrovertible physical evidence that the standards of physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached, and machines were connected to the internet in violation of professional standards and ..."

    Sidney Powell Drops The Legal Hammer In Georgia - Here's The Full Lawsuit And Details

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to A.J. For This Useful Post:

    Lindaeverchanging (11-27-2020), Quest (11-27-2020)

  3. #2
    Super Moderator Quest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ashville, Alabama
    Posts
    5,920
    Thanked: 3402
    Blog Entries
    2
    It is a disgrace that Kemp will not support validation! And it is a disgrace that democrats are not supporting a validation process....

  4. #3
    Both Kemp and Raffensperger are conservative Republicans who support Trump.

    If the allegations of the suit are true, i.e., "that the most egregious acts of voter and ballot fraud took place," I'm baffled as to why these two conservative Republicans would not stop the certification.

  5. #4
    If Biden is at 306, then Powell would need to stop the certification in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and either Michigan or Arizona in order to get Biden below 270 (must be three states, not just one.) She has until the December-8 certification deadline to do so. If she can keep certification at bay for eleven more days, she sends the election to the House. Problem is that the judiciary, despite the 200+ conservative judges that have been appointed to it by Trump in the past few years, still appears to be solidly anti-Trump.

  6. #5
    Maybe I'm naive, but I would hope that a judge would rule based on the merits of the lawsuit without regard to whether he or she was appointed by or voted for president Trump.

  7. #6
    So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    7,824
    Thanked: 7519
    Quote Originally Posted by njtom View Post
    Maybe I'm naive, but I would hope that a judge would rule based on the merits of the lawsuit without regard to whether he or she was appointed by or voted for president Trump.
    In this case they'll be voting for their survival, not Trump. I can't imagine the SC deciding to pack itself with leftie nuts. Put yourselves in their shoes, a lifetime job surrounded by dirt worshiping hippies..ah..that will be a hard "no".

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by John View Post
    In this case they'll be voting for their survival, not Trump. I can't imagine the SC deciding to pack itself with leftie nuts. Put yourselves in their shoes, a lifetime job surrounded by dirt worshiping hippies..ah..that will be a hard "no".
    Given that Republicans appear likely to hold the Senate (and even if there were a 50-50 tie, a red-state Democrat like Joe Manchin might not agree to things like court-packing,) the Supreme Court will probably figure that it is little danger of being packed, since the Senate wouldn't go along with such a packing plan. As such, they may, unfortunately, feel freer to rule against Trump.

  9. #8
    So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    7,824
    Thanked: 7519
    Quote Originally Posted by MercyandFaith View Post
    Given that Republicans appear likely to hold the Senate (and even if there were a 50-50 tie, a red-state Democrat like Joe Manchin might not agree to things like court-packing,) the Supreme Court will probably figure that it is little danger of being packed, since the Senate wouldn't go along with such a packing plan. As such, they may, unfortunately, feel freer to rule against Trump.
    They won't trust their fate to another rigged Georgia election or depend on Joe Manchin for survival, you think they are rubes or something, like the rest of us?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to John For This Useful Post:

    Quest (11-27-2020)

  11. #9
    Super Moderator Quest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ashville, Alabama
    Posts
    5,920
    Thanked: 3402
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by njtom View Post
    Both Kemp and Raffensperger are conservative Republicans who support Trump.

    If the allegations of the suit are true, i.e., "that the most egregious acts of voter and ballot fraud took place," I'm baffled as to why these two conservative Republicans would not stop the certification.
    Rumor has it...Dominion money...Time will tell

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Avoid unexpected, expensive repair costs with an extended warranty for your Suzuki. Many vehicle repairs can cost thousands of dollars in unexpected expense, now may be the time to consider an extended service plan for your vehicle.