The London Times reports that a recent study by The Bible Society concludes, contrary to half a century of feminist ravings about patriarchy and misogyny in Scripture, that the Bible is not misogynist. ...
Is this news? Not to those who've read the Bible it isn't

Actually this is a Feb 2009 article on a Times report from Oct 2008 (so I guess everyone's read it, but a refresh never hurts )

Headings:
Women in the Old Testament
Women in the New Testament
Do separate roles for women and men inherently devalue women? and
What was the role of purity laws in ancient Judaism?

See "London Times reports that the Bible is not anti-female: is this news?"

Another great article is "The Bible's high view of women grounded in the creation account"

Headings:
Women and the Fall
Women in the Old Testament
The Purity Laws
Women in the New Testament
Do differing roles inherently devalue women?
The relational maleness of God
Does the Bible use female imagery for God?
Male imagery referring to God
Was male imagery and incarnation a concession to a patriarchal culture?
Is it anti-female to refer to God with male pronouns?
Does secularism have anything better to offer? and
Conclusion
Far from being repressive for women, the biblical worldview is better for women than its secular counterpart, because it recognizes and celebrates the innate differences between men and women while affirming the ontological equality of men and women as created in God's image. This positive view of women is seen throughout Scripture. That Christians with a biblical view of God insist on calling Him by the male names He has given Himself in no way reflects negatively on the biblical view of women, because both men and women are created in the image of God. Because of this, Christians are commanded to treat both men and women with proper dignity and respect. Replacing biblical language for God with unbiblical female names and terminology does not elevate women, but is an attempt to redefine God Himself. The same hermeneutic that allows exegetes to replace "Father, Son and Holy Spirit" with "Mother, Daughter, and Life-bearing Womb" would also free humans to reinterpret any part of Scripture to fit with the spirit of the age—including the many parts of the Bible which are explicitly pro-female! If we are free to redefine even one word of Scripture, not one word of it is unchangeable.