-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Romans828
I'm curious too, but I'd hate to waste $100 or more on a test that is
less than accurate according to many people.
You go first, Fuego, and let us know what you think.
Actually, I had planned to do it soon, but now that I hear it's not accurate, I'll use that hundred bucks to buy a new pair of Michael Kors shoes I've been eyeing at Dillard's.
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Valiant Woman
That's because my hair is colored smart guy. And you need your eyes checked. I look quite black.
Your hair looks quite "white" by the standards of my childhood. And that is sort of the point, the "standards" change over time. Black women with yellow hair was unthinkable 40 years ago, that I remember. Now it isn't, whether they are trying to look white or not.
The photo in your profile looks less white.
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Valiant Woman
Actually, I had planned to do it soon, but now that I hear it's not accurate, I'll use that hundred bucks to buy a new pair of Michael Kors shoes I've been eyeing at Dillard's.
You women are vain
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Pentecali
You women are vain
-
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Colonel
Your hair looks quite "white" by the standards of my childhood. And that is sort of the point, the "standards" change over time. Black women with yellow hair was unthinkable 40 years ago, that I remember. Now it isn't, whether they are trying to look white or not.
The photo in your profile looks less white.
And you suffer from color blindness.
-
-
Senior Member
Nope, brown is less black than black is. Period.
-
-
Senior Member
As the presiding prelate of LFF, I'm closing this discussion
Too much foolishness saints
-
-
Senior Member
Is that lock "black" or "white" ? Just kidding.
Needless to say, I couldn't care less if ValW's hair is black or brown and if that qualifies as true black or almost black. Let the white women wear their dreads too. If it comes across as a tribute to "blackness" then why not ?
-
-
So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.
Employers Can Now Legally Discriminate Against People With Dreadlocks
At the time, CMS had a “race-neutral grooming policy” requesting that employees have hairstyles that “reflect a business/professional image,” per the case file. Jones’ dreadlocks, a common natural hairstyle for black men and women, didn’t fall under that umbrella. The EEOC asserted that CMS violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which “prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.”
The court disagreed, maintaining that dreadlocks, though “culturally associated with race,” aren’t an “immutable characteristic of black persons.”
http://www.usmagazine.com/stylish/ne...dlocks-w441580
-
-
Banned
Originally Posted by
John
Employers Can Now Legally Discriminate Against People With Dreadlocks
is the phrase "legally discriminitate" an oxymoron?
If you don't want to employ someone 'cause they look stupid them why should you have to?
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
You can avoid expensive repair costs with an extended service plan for your
Hyundai. Many vehicle repairs can cost thousands of dollars in surprise expense, now may be the time to consider an extended service plan for your vehicle.